Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5: Which Frontier Model Wins for Your Workload? (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 and OpenAI GPT-5: pricing, reasoning, context length, coding, and agentic capabilities. Pick the right top-tier LLM for your team.
Verdict:Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding, long-horizon agents, and 1M-token document analysis. GPT-5 leads on integrated multimodal (Sora 2, DALL-E) and consumer ecosystem reach (GPTs). Engineering and document-heavy workflows favor Claude Opus 4.7; creative, multimodal, and consumer-facing products favor GPT-5. Many teams use both via API for different jobs.
Table of Contents
Claude Opus 4.7 & ChatGPT (GPT-5) Overview
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic's flagship 2026 model. 1M-token context, top-tier long-horizon agentic stability, and SOTA-level coding scores on SWE-bench Verified.
Learn more about Claude Opus 4.7 →ChatGPT (GPT-5)
OpenAI's frontier model available inside ChatGPT. Industry-leading multimodal integration (Sora 2, DALL-E 3, Code Interpreter) and Codex coding agent.
Learn more about ChatGPT (GPT-5) →Feature & Pricing Comparison
| Feature | Claude Opus 4.7 | ChatGPT (GPT-5) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (~750K words) | 400,000+ (in ChatGPT) |
| Reasoning mode | Extended Thinking | GPT-5 Thinking / Pro |
| Coding (SWE-bench Verified) | Industry-leading | Top tier (with Codex) |
| Multimodal | Text, image, code (no native video gen) | Text, image, audio, video (Sora 2) |
| Agent execution | Claude Code, Computer Use, MCP | ChatGPT Agent Mode, Operator |
| API price (input) | $15 / 1M tokens | $10+ / 1M tokens (GPT-5 family) |
| API price (output) | $75 / 1M tokens | $40+ / 1M tokens (GPT-5 family) |
| Personal subscription | Claude Pro $20 / Max $100-200 | ChatGPT Plus $20 / Pro $200 |
| Japanese fluency | Top tier | Top tier |
| MCP support | Native (proposed by Anthropic) | Adopting |
| Prompt caching | Up to 90% reduction | Supported |
| Enterprise availability | Bedrock, Vertex AI, Azure | Azure OpenAI Service, Enterprise |
Our Verdict
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7 leads on coding, long-horizon agents, and 1M-token document analysis. GPT-5 leads on integrated multimodal (Sora 2, DALL-E) and consumer ecosystem reach (GPTs). Engineering and document-heavy workflows favor Claude Opus 4.7; creative, multimodal, and consumer-facing products favor GPT-5. Many teams use both via API for different jobs.
Recommendations by Use Case
Software engineering and coding
SOTA SWE-bench Verified scores plus Claude Code's autonomous execution
Million-token document analysis
1M context avoids chunking; coherent reasoning across the whole corpus
Multimodal creative work (video/image)
Sora 2 and DALL-E 3 in one platform
Consumer-facing product integration
GPTs ecosystem and brand recognition lower adoption friction
AWS Bedrock / Salesforce shops
Bedrock and Salesforce have leaned in on Claude
Cost-sensitive single-shot tasks
GPT-5 family API pricing tends to be cheaper; Plus at $20 still very capable
Detailed Reviews
More Comparisons
ChatGPT vs Claude
Compare OpenAI ChatGPT and Anthropic Claude side by side — pricing, features, coding ability, context window, and more. Find out which AI chatbot is the best choice for you.
ChatGPT vs Gemini
Compare OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Gemini on pricing, features, Google integration, and multimodal capabilities. Find out which AI assistant is right for you.
Midjourney vs DALL-E 3
Compare Midjourney and DALL-E 3 on image quality, ease of use, pricing, and text rendering. Find the best AI image generation tool for your creative needs.
GitHub Copilot vs Cursor
Compare GitHub Copilot and Cursor on features, pricing, supported languages, and developer experience. Find the best AI coding assistant for your workflow.
AI Marketing Tools by Our Team
SaaS products developed and operated by the AIpedia team.