n8n vs Make: Which Workflow Automation Platform Is Better? [2026 Comparison]
Compare self-hosted n8n with cloud-based Make (formerly Integromat) on pricing, extensibility, privacy, and usability. Find the best automation foundation for your needs.
Verdict:n8n and Make take different approaches to workflow automation. n8n is open-source and self-hostable for complete data control and unlimited execution. Code nodes and LangChain integration enable advanced developer customization. Make is cloud-based with an intuitive visual editor and 1,800+ integrations for fast no-code automation. For data privacy and developer-level customization, choose n8n. For quick no-code setup, choose Make.
Table of Contents
n8n & Make Overview
n8n
An open-source workflow automation platform. Self-hostable for complete data control. Supports code nodes for custom logic and AI agent building with LangChain integration. Developer-oriented.
Learn more about n8n →Make
Formerly Integromat. A cloud-based visual flow editor for complex automation workflows. 1,800+ app integrations with intuitive UI for no-code advanced automation.
Learn more about Make →Feature & Pricing Comparison
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Community Free (self-host) / Cloud Starter €20/mo / Pro €50/mo | Free / Core $10.59/mo / Pro $18.82/mo / Teams $34.12/mo |
| Self-Hosting | Yes (Docker/npm, completely free) | No (cloud only) |
| Open Source | Yes (fair-code license) | No (proprietary) |
| App Integrations | 400+ plus custom node creation | 1,800+ |
| Code Customization | JavaScript/Python code nodes for full customization | Limited (primarily no-code) |
| AI Features | AI agent building (LangChain integration) | AI integration modules available |
| Data Privacy | Self-hosted for complete data control | Cloud (processed on Make's servers) |
| Ease of Use | Somewhat technical (developer-oriented) | Intuitive visual editor |
| Multilingual Support | English UI (community translations) | English UI (community support available) |
| Execution Limits | Unlimited on self-hosted | Plan-based operation limits |
Our Verdict
Our Verdict
n8n and Make take different approaches to workflow automation. n8n is open-source and self-hostable for complete data control and unlimited execution. Code nodes and LangChain integration enable advanced developer customization. Make is cloud-based with an intuitive visual editor and 1,800+ integrations for fast no-code automation. For data privacy and developer-level customization, choose n8n. For quick no-code setup, choose Make.
Recommendations by Use Case
Self-hosted automation with full data control
Self-hosting ensures complete data privacy. GDPR-compliant and safe for processing confidential data.
Quick no-code workflow automation
Intuitive visual flow editor enables complex automation without technical expertise. 1,800+ app integrations.
Building AI agents into advanced automation
LangChain integration and code nodes enable flexible AI agent workflow construction.
Detailed Reviews
More Comparisons
ChatGPT vs Claude
Compare OpenAI ChatGPT and Anthropic Claude side by side — pricing, features, coding ability, context window, and more. Find out which AI chatbot is the best choice for you.
ChatGPT vs Gemini
Compare OpenAI ChatGPT and Google Gemini on pricing, features, Google integration, and multimodal capabilities. Find out which AI assistant is right for you.
Midjourney vs DALL-E 3
Compare Midjourney and DALL-E 3 on image quality, ease of use, pricing, and text rendering. Find the best AI image generation tool for your creative needs.
GitHub Copilot vs Cursor
Compare GitHub Copilot and Cursor on features, pricing, supported languages, and developer experience. Find the best AI coding assistant for your workflow.
AI Marketing Tools by Our Team
SaaS products developed and operated by the AIpedia team.